Radiometric dating artifact trackback url closed
After a 5-year trial, Jerusalem judge Aharon Farkash recently acquitted the defendants of all charges of forgery. (June 13, 2012)—A new analysis and new evidence proves that the controversial “Brother of Jesus” inscription on an ancient bone box, or ossuary, is authentic, according to the July/August issue of Biblical Archaeology Review (BAR), the world’s largest circulation magazine devoted to Biblical archaeology.In “High Quality” mode (@328kbit/s) it is on a par with ATRAC SP (Type-R, @292kbit/s) compression algorithm which is used in Minidisc recorders/players.In “Middle Quality” mode (@229kbit/s) it is roughly comparable with [email protected]/s or [email protected]/s.It follows a sample date obtained during the 2012 dig season on material located above the concrete at 24,800 years, meaning this structure has a construction profile stretching back almost 30,000 years.“The ancient people who built these pyramids knew the secrets of frequency and energy.They used these natural resources to develop technologies and undertake construction on scales we have never witnessed on earth,” said Dr. Evidence clearly shows that the pyramids were built asancient energy machines aligned with the earth’s energy grid, providing energy for healing as well as power.
Close positioning of the two codecs – SBC (High Quality) and ATRAC SP (Type-R) – on perceptual quality scale is revealing.
Ancient historians in the US have news just as astonishing as anything found in the far corners of the globe.
For instance, the Rockwall discovery outside of Dallas, Texas, is only one example of how we are now re-examining ancient mysteries to reveal more about our past, right in the United States.
But his verdict doesn’t mean the Aramaic inscription on the bone box, “James, son of Joseph, brother of Jesus,” is authentic. Department of Justice lawyer and BAR editor Hershel Shanks explains why it can be said beyond reasonable doubt that the inscription is authentic, and he presents new evidence not available at the trial to support this conclusion.
It only means that the prosecution failed to present evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that the inscription is a forgery. First and foremost, two world-acclaimed script experts, known as paleographers, have analyzed the inscription and pronounced it authentic.But the names are “Joseph, Judah and Hadas,” not “James, Joseph and Jesus.” This bone box with the names “Joseph, Judah and Hadas” is published for the first time in the July/August issue of BAR.